Winning the Lottery - Its Nice to Have an Edge
Lets start putting the Lottery Footprint (LFP) to work on a real lottery. I’ve selected Lotto Texas because it is closest to the example lottery I used in the last post. If you’re a newcomer and haven’t the slightest, then go back and read Winning Lotto Strategies - Donald Trump Has a Pretty Big Shoe, to bring yourself up to speed.
In the TX654 lottery there are 25,827,165 possible wagers. Therefore, the denominator in the LFP is 25.827165. So, for the typical player, spending $25 dollars, his LFP is:
LFP = 25/25.827165 = 0.97
But, you’re not the typical player, you use LONA™, your Lottery Number Advisor. Using the various Lottery Tools, you’ve created a 40 number Play List. A 40 number Play List has 3,838,380 possible wagers. So, if you also spend $25, your LFP is much better.
LFP = 25/3.83838 = 6.51
Even though your cost was the same, your Lottery Footprint is much bigger; you have much better coverage.
This raises an interesting question, How much would the typical player have to spend to achieve the same LFP as you? The answer is:
Dollars = 6.51 x 25.827165 = $168
WOW! The typical lottery player in Texas would have to spend $168 to achieve the same coverage, the same LFP that you have.
Isn’t it nice to have an edge? But, hold on. We’re not done with LFP yet. In fact, we’re just getting started. Now that we have a way to compare Lottery Strategies, lets use that edge to cut a little deeper tomorrow.
Discussion Area - Leave a Comment